The “Illusion of Explanatory Depth”: How Much Do We Know About What We Know? (broken link was removed)
…
I wouldn’t be surprised, however, if it turns out that the illusion of explanatory depth leads many researchers down the wrong path, because they think they understand something that lies outside of their expertise when they don’t.
Great stuff. It took me a lot longer to stop asking why, why, why than most kids. I only gave up after years of repeated obvious clues that I was not suppose to ask why (once I aged past 5 or 8 or something – I actually have no idea when it is no longer desired). But most days I, curious cat, want to ask how does that work, why do we do that, why can’t we… I just stop myself. But it does mean I asked myself and realized I don’t really know. So I am at least more aware how little I really know, I think I am anyway.
The internet is a great thing. Google doesn’t mind if you ask as many questions as you want.
Related: Theory of Knowledge – Feed your Newborn Neurons

Pingback: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » The Illusion of Understanding
Pingback: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Sarah, aged 3, Learns About Soap
Very interesting question, John. I have two kids and ask me all the time how stuff works. I really thought I knew more than I actually know.
Pingback: Forecasting Oil Prices at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog
Pingback: Curious Cat Science Blog » Poor Reporting and Unfounded Implications
Pingback: Curious Cat Science Blog » The Year in Bad Science
Pingback: Encouraging Curiosity in Kids » Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog
Pingback: ASQ Influential Voices: Future Engineers and Scientists » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
Pingback: Theory of Knowledge: Can We Trust Our Memories? « The W. Edwards Deming Institute Blog
Pingback: Your Online Presence and Social Network for Managers » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
Pingback: Children are Amazingly Creative At Solving Problems » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog