When the world’s great scientific thinkers change their minds
I have always believed that the scientist’s most sacred obligation is to continue to do science. Now I know that I was dead wrong. I am driven to the ultimately wise advice of my Columbia mentor, I.I. Rabi, who, in our many corridor bull sessions, urged his students to run for public office and get elected. He insisted that to be an advisor (he was an advisor to Oppenheimer at Los Alamos, later to Eisenhower and to the AEC) was ultimately an exercise in futility and that the power belonged to those who are elected. Then, we thought the old man was bonkers. But today… A Congress which is overwhelmingly dominated by lawyers and MBAs makes no sense in this 21st century in which almost all issues have a science and technology aspect.
It is important for some scientists to take on other important rolls in society – political leaders, popular authors, business leaders, government officials (regulators etc.), political commentators…
Related: Science and Engineering in Politics – The A to Z Guide to Political Interference in Science – Diplomacy and Science Research – Proposed Legislation on Science and Education – Global Scientific Leadership – Open Access Journal Wars
I’ve been thinking the same thing for some time, actually, just having more people of every field going into politics instead of having politics being a sole profession of politicians seems like a good idea. Switzerland is good example, the government is made up of people with actual jobs, and was developed by using the US system as a basis.
This is one reason why I’ve been favoring Ron Paul for the US office, he really is the only candidate who has had a significant career in a science/medical related field, a rarity in the US government, and I think the logical reasoning from his medical schooling comes across when he speaks on issues.
-APScribble
Pingback: CuriousCat: Scientists and Engineers in Congress
Pingback: Curious Cat Science Blog » 76 Nobel Laureates in Science Endorse Obama