Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John P. A. Ioannidis

A finding from a well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trial starting with a 50% pre-study chance that the intervention is effective is eventually true about 85% of the time. A fairly similar performance is expected of a confirmatory meta-analysis of good-quality randomized trials: potential bias probably increases, but power and pre-test chances are higher compared to a single randomized trial.

2 thoughts on “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  1. Pingback: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » I Support the Public Library of Science

  2. Pingback: Statistical Errors in Medical Studies » Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog

Comments are closed.