Category Archives: Science

Virus Found to be One Likely Factor in Bee Colony Collapse Disorder

Photo of a bee bu Justin Hunter

Scientists say a virus appears to be a factor in honeybee colony collapse by Andrew C. Revkin:

Scientists sifting genetic material from thriving and ailing bee colonies say a virus appears to be a prime suspect – but is unlikely to be the only culprit – in the mass die-offs of honeybees reported last autumn and winter.

Very well stated. The virus while seeming to be a factor in the deaths appears to cause death in colonies that are stressed which seem to be highly correlated with colonies that are moved from place to place by commercial beekeepers to pollinate various crops. Bees that are kept by hobbiest, wild bees… don’t seem to be dying off. The impact of CCD is growing economically as prices for renting bees to pollinate crops increases and in some cases there are not enough bees available. Honey prices are increasing and prices for food pollinated by bees are too.

The Department of Agriculture states: The only pathogen found in almost all samples from honey bee colonies with CCD, but not in non-CCD colonies, was the Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), a dicistrovirus that can be transmitted by the varroa mite. It was found in 96.1 percent of the CCD-bee samples. This does not identify IAPV as the cause of CCD,” said Pettis. “What we have found is strictly a strong correlation of the appearance of IAPV and CCD together. We have not proven a cause-and-effect connection.”

Related: Bee researchers close in on Colony Collapse Disorder, Penn State (Penn State broke the link so it was removed) – Bye Bye BeesBee Colony Collapse Disorder CCDMore on Disappearing HoneybeesColony Collapse Disorder and Pollinator Decline

Science Blogging Conference

The second annual Science Blogging Conference will be held Saturday, January 19, 2008 at the Sigma Xi Center in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Earlier this year—almost in time for the inaugural conference—we edited and published the first-ever science blogging anthology, The Open Laboratory: The Best Writing on Science Blogs 2006, which was an instant hit. We’re already collecting nominations for the next edition of the anthology. Send your best posts of the year (or nominate posts written by others) by using this submission form

Related: The Science Blogging Anthology – the Great Unveiling!Science Blogging Conference in NC 2007

Mission to Mars

This post was submitted by Richard Lachman, via our post suggestion form.

Race to Mars is a huge Discovery Channel Canada project that tries to present the most scientifically accurate vision of a human mission to Mars possible. With input from over 175 Scientists, the 4-hour mini-series uses Hollywood effects to illustrate a scientifically grounded mission-plan. There’s also a 6-hour documentary series on the science, and a major education/outreach project online. The website includes free downloadable 3D games and web-games that blend riveting game play with science-inspired subject material. We’re using Serious Games to educate without being completely didactic, and we include curriculum-based science material to back up our content.

It is indeed a resource worth checking out. Related: Mars RoverNASA Engineering ChallengesImmense Amount of Ice Found on Mars

Clues to Prion Infectivity

Structural Studies Reveal New Clues to Prion Infectivity

One of the unexplained questions facing prion researchers is how a single prion can apparently assume different conformations — with each conformation having different disease or phenotypic properties. Previous structural studies of prions had not yielded a clear understanding of the basis of strains because the prion protein is large and complex. Due to the size and complexity of prions, studies utilizing x-ray crystallography, a technique commonly used to determine the structure of proteins and other molecules, have been limited to short peptide fragments of the prion protein.

“There have been a number of fairly low-resolution pictures of prions that more or less proved that these different strains were in different conformations; but they really hadn’t established the nature of the different conformations,” Weissman said. “It was really a big black box. We basically didn’t have the conformation of any single prion, let alone the two prion protein strains in two different conformations.”

““In our minds, our findings brought to a certain level of closure the understanding of the structural differences underlying strains,” said Weissman. “Now we understand the structural differences. We also have an idea how those differences lead to the differences in physical properties, and, in turn, how these differences in the physical properties lead to the phenotypic differences. We are starting to go all the way from the structural understanding of the different strains up to in vivo understanding of why they cause different behaviors inside the cell.”

Weissman noted that the findings offer a broader lesson to researchers studying prions and other proteins whose misfolding can cause disease. “Certainly, a bottom line from this study is that the rules of protein folding and the rules of protein misfolding are fundamentally different,” he said. “In many ways, we have to relearn basic principles of how proteins misfold. We have to forget many of the rules we learned from textbooks about protein folding because they are not necessarily applicable.”

Prions are very interesting. Related posts: Scientists Knock-out Prion Gene in CowsGene Study Finds Cannibal PatternOpen Access Education Materials on Protein Folding

Science Summary: Photosynthesis

Seed’s latest cribsheet, a one page summary of Photosynthesis:

Through the process of photosynthesis, plants, algae, and bacteria use sunlight to convert water and carbon dioxide into the oxygen and food that sustain much of life on Earth. This Cribsheet covers the basics of photosynthesis: where it happens, how light is used in the process, and why we think photosynthesis may have triggered the rise of complex life. In addition, we tell you why plants are green and how photosynthesis could temper climate change—if rainforests and oceanic ecosystems aren’t destroyed.

Related: String Theory Explained in One PagePhysics Concepts in 60 SecondsChemistry of Common Items

Buckminster Fuller $100,000 Challenge

The Buckminster Fuller Challenge seeks submissions of design science solutions within a broad range of human endeavor that exemplify the trimtab principle. Trimtabs demonstrate how small amounts of energy and resources precisely applied at the right time and place can produce maximum advantageous change.

Solutions should be:

* Comprehensive — a clear demonstration of holistic systems thinking.
* Anticipatory — projectively tracking critical trends and needs; identifying and assessing long term consequences of proposed solutions.
* Ecologically responsible — reflective and supportive of nature’s underlying processes, patterns and principles.
* Verifiable — able to withstand rigorous empirical testing.
* Replicable — capable of being readily undertaken by others.
* Achievable — likely to be implemented successfully and broadly adopted.

How to enter

Related: Everything I Know, 42-hours with Buckminster FullerGolden BuckyballsGrainger Challenge Prize for Sustainability$10 Million for Science SolutionsCivil Engineering Challenges

I Support the Public Library of Science

I support PLoS graphic

I am a fan of the Public Library of Science, as I have mentioned previous. Yesterday I donated some money to support their great efforts. From the PLoS site:

During this time of transition from traditional to open access publishing, we must develop creative ways to support the launch of new journals, the investment in new publishing technologies, and efforts to increase awareness of, and commitment to, open access.

Related posts:

Richard Palmer on Engineering and Innovation

Q and A: Richard Palmer interview

Palmer: d3o is a soft, flexible material that combines properties associated with liquids and enables them in solids. Normally the study of mechanics of materials in solids is entirely different to the study of fluids and what I have done is combine the two. The fluid properties that are incorporated in d3o allow it to be stretchable, soft, to flow and to feel comfortable. But in an impact, that fluid turns into an elastomer and everything locks together to dissipate, spread and absorb the impact.

CNN: Can you go into the applications of that?
Palmer:
You can use d3o in sportswear where you want freedom of movement and dexterity but also want some impact absorption. It’s in footwear, headwear, gloves, clothing and boots.

It means people can get on with their sport without being confounded by pieces of bulky, rigid plastic and cumbersome, stiff foams. It’s the difference between Robocop and Spiderman. Robocop is built with protection around him like a shield; d3o is more like Spiderman, where the protection and the athlete are integrated together. It’s a discrete, small and totally unrestricted layer of protection in the areas where you need it that wouldn’t previously have been possible.

CNN: What advice would you give someone who wanted to become an innovator?
Palmer:
Open your eyes to both creative and analytical thinking. Scientists aren’t just boffins; creatives aren’t just mad lunatics. There’s a huge opportunity to dovetail the two. And follow something you believe in.

Related: Entrepreneurial EngineersWhat a Computer Game Programmer Needs to KnowInventor for Hire

Five Scientists Who Made the Modern World

Interesting post by John Hawks: Five scientists who made the modern world

If you were to make a list of the top five scientists who ever lived, who would you choose? People are asking the question (also, here, here). So far, it hasn’t been all that interesting. All the lists have two or three names in common, and throw in two or three unexpected names for balance…
But once your list includes Newton, Einstein, and Maxwell, and then you throw in Galileo, well there’s not much room for anything else. None at all if you take Darwin as a given.

So I decided to do something a little different: What five scientists have had the greatest impact on human life?

1. R. A. Fisher. His work in population genetics laid the foundations for the vast productivity increases of twentieth-century agriculture. He was far from alone in this, but he stood apart from his contemporaries by inventing many of the statistical methods that would come to define scientific hypothesis testing. Without Fisher’s innovations in statistics, large-scale medical research studies would be meaningless. All this after he established the basis for Mendelian inheritance of continuous characters.
2. Louis Pasteur…
3. Leo Szilárd…
4. John von Neumann…
5. This one is for you. Who else belongs on this list?

How about Norman Borlaug? Related: 20 Scientists Who Have Helped Shape Our World. I must admit I am biased – I am a big fan of Sir R.A. Fisher (this link has a number of resources with more information on his work). Partially because he did great stuff but also because I am somewhat connected to him. George Box was R.A. Fisher’s student and married Joan Box. My father was George Box’s student and then colleague. So seeing R.A. Fisher ranked #1 feels nice (even if actual ranking makes little sense… but it can be interesting).

Related: William G. Hunter: An innovator and Catalyst for Quality Improvement by George BoxR A Fisher: the Life of a Scientist by Joan Box

YouTube+ for Science from PLoS

SciVee is a new site by the great people at PLoS, with support from NSF and San Diego Supercomputer Center. It is very early in the launch of this effort but it looks very promising.

SciVee allows scientists to communicate their work as a multimedia presentation incorporated with the content of their published article. Other scientists can freely view uploaded presentations and engage in virtual discussions with the author and other viewers. SciVee also facilitates the creation of communities around specific articles and keywords. Use this medium to meet peers and future collaborators that share your particular research interests.

Of course plenty of great videos are already online but this looks like another great effort at helping improve communication of scientific ideas by the Public Library of Science. And there are advantages to a community lead by scientists that not only posts videos but encourages scientific discussion on the related matters. I am hopeful (and confident) this will become a great resource.

Related: Science and Engineering Webcast DirectoryStanford Linear Accelerator Center Public LecturesGoogle Engineering and Technology Webcasts
Originally I posted this to my employers blog: Engineering and…. It turns out it was made public prematurely – SciVee update.